Scientific literature review

Scientific literature review

Writing a literature review, you become an ambassador for the subject, an author owning the story. You no longer summarize the literature, but instead provide reasoning like an expert in the subject, and this is crucial. Connect with other authors I take interest in connecting with the authors of the papers I A scientific literature review is a critical account of what has been published on a topic by accredited researchers. It may be: • A stand-alone assignment • An introduction to an essay, report, thesis, etc. • Part of research/grant proposals. Scientific Literature Review: Writing a literature review will: • Improve your topic knowledge • Provide new insight on your topic to others • Demonstrate your literature File Size: 1MB  · When I undertook the task of writing a scientific literature review article last year, I had hoped that a Google search would reveal a handful of how-to pages thoughtfully created by veterans of this particular writing process. I found nothing of the sort, so I plowed ahead on my own, inventing techniques for myself

Writing a Literature Review // Purdue Writing Lab

A literature review surveys books, scientific literature review, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation of these works in relation to the research problem being investigated. Literature reviews are designed to provide an overview of sources you have explored while researching a particular topic and to demonstrate to your readers how your research fits within a larger field of study.

Fink, Arlene, scientific literature review. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. Fourth edition.

Thousand Oaks, CA: Scientific literature review, A literature review may consist of simply a summary of key sources, scientific literature review, but in the social sciences, a literature review usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories.

A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in a way that informs how you are planning to investigate a research problem. The analytical scientific literature review of a literature review might:. The purpose of a literature review is to:. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, ; Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination.

Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, ; Jesson, Jill. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. Los Angeles, scientific literature review, CA: SAGE, ; Knopf, Jeffrey W. Scientific literature review Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students.

Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, It is important to think of knowledge in a given field as consisting of three layers. First, there are the primary studies that researchers conduct and publish. Second are the reviews of those studies that summarize and offer new interpretations built from and often extending beyond the primary studies. Third, there are the perceptions, conclusions, opinion, and interpretations that are shared informally that become part of the lore of field.

In composing a literature review, scientific literature review, it is important to note that it is often this third layer of knowledge that is cited as "true" even though it often has only a loose relationship to the primary studies and secondary literature reviews.

Given this, while literature reviews are designed to provide an overview and synthesis of pertinent sources you have explored, there are a number of approaches you could adopt depending upon the type of analysis underpinning your study. Types of Literature Reviews. Argumentative Review This form examines literature selectively in order to support or refute an argument, scientific literature review, deeply imbedded assumption, or philosophical problem already established in the literature.

The purpose is to develop a body of literature that establishes a contrarian viewpoint. Given the value-laden nature of some social science research [e. However, note that they can also introduce problems of bias when they are used to make summary claims of the sort found in systematic reviews [see below].

Integrative Review Considered a form of research that reviews, critiques, and synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated. The body of literature includes all studies that address related or identical hypotheses or research problems.

A well-done integrative review meets the same standards as primary research in regard to clarity, rigor, and replication. This is the most common form of review in the social sciences. Historical Review Few things rest in isolation scientific literature review historical precedent.

Historical literature reviews focus on examining research scientific literature review a period of time, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory, phenomena emerged in the literature, then tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline. The purpose is to place research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and to identify the likely directions for future research.

Methodological Review A review does not always focus on what someone said [findings], scientific literature review, but how they came about saying what they say [method of analysis].

Reviewing methods of analysis provides a framework of understanding at different levels [i. those of theory, substantive fields, scientific literature review, research approaches, and data collection and analysis techniques], how researchers draw upon a wide variety of knowledge ranging from the conceptual level to practical documents for use in fieldwork in the areas of ontological and epistemological consideration, quantitative and qualitative integration, sampling, interviewing, data collection, and data analysis.

This approach helps highlight ethical issues which you should be aware of and consider as you go through your own study. Systematic Review This form consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a clearly scientific literature review research question, which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant research, scientific literature review, and to collect, report, and analyze data from the studies that are included in the review, scientific literature review.

The goal is to deliberately document, critically evaluate, and summarize scientifically all of the research about a clearly defined research problem. Typically it focuses on a very specific empirical question, often posed in a cause-and-effect form, such as "To what extent does A contribute to B?

Theoretical Review The purpose of this form is to examine the corpus of theory that has accumulated in regard to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena. The theoretical literature review helps to scientific literature review what theories already exist, the relationships between them, to what degree the existing theories have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested.

Often this form is used to help establish a lack of appropriate theories or reveal that current theories are inadequate for explaining new or emerging research problems. The unit of analysis can focus on a theoretical concept or a whole theory or framework. Baumeister, Roy F. and Mark R, scientific literature review. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, ; Kennedy, Mary M. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, scientific literature review, ; Torracro, Richard.

and Maria S. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Los Angeles, scientific literature review, CA: Sage Publications, Thinking About Your Literature Review.

The structure of a literature review should include the following :. The critical evaluation of each work should consider :. Development of the Literature Review. Four Stages 1. Problem formulation -- which topic or field is being examined and what are its component issues? Literature search -- finding materials relevant to the subject being explored, scientific literature review.

Data evaluation -- determining which literature makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the topic. Analysis and interpretation -- discussing the findings and conclusions of pertinent literature. Consider the following issues before writing the literature review: Clarify If your assignment is not very specific about what form your literature review should take, seek clarification from your professor by asking these questions: 1.

Roughly how many sources should I include? What types of sources should I review books, journal articles, scientific literature review, websites; scholarly versus popular scientific literature review Should I summarize, synthesize, or critique sources by discussing a common theme or issue?

Should I evaluate the sources? Find Models Use the exercise of reviewing the literature to examine how authors in your discipline or area of interest have composed their literature review sections.

Read them to get a sense of the types scientific literature review themes you might want to look for in your own research or to identify ways to organize your final review. The bibliography or reference section of sources you've already read are also excellent entry points into your own research.

Narrow the Topic The narrower your topic, the easier it will be to limit the number of sources you need to read in order to obtain a good survey of relevant resources, scientific literature review.

Your professor will probably not expect you to read everything that's available about the topic, but you'll make your job easier if you first limit scope of the research problem. A good strategy is to begin by searching the USC Libraries Catalog for books about the topic and review the table of contents for chapters that focuses on specific issues. You can also review the indexes of books to find references to specific issues that can serve as the focus of your research. For example, a book surveying the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict may include scientific literature review chapter on the role Egypt has played in mediating the conflict, scientific literature review, or look in the index for the pages where Egypt is mentioned in the text.

Consider Whether Your Sources are Current Scientific literature review disciplines require that you use information that is as current as possible, scientific literature review. This is particularly true in disciplines in medicine and the sciences where research conducted becomes obsolete very quickly as new discoveries are made. However, when writing a review in the social sciences, a survey of the history of the literature may be required. In other words, a complete understanding the research problem requires you to deliberately examine how knowledge and perspectives have changed over time.

Sort through other current bibliographies or literature reviews in the field to get a sense of what your discipline expects. You can also use this method to explore what is considered by scholars to be a "hot topic" and what is not. Ways to Organize Your Literature Review.

Chronology of Events If your review follows the chronological method, you could write about the materials according to when they were published. This approach should only be followed if a clear path of research building on previous research can be identified and that these trends follow a clear chronological order of development.

For example, scientific literature review, a literature review that focuses on continuing research about the emergence of German economic power after the fall of the Soviet Union. By Publication Order your sources by publication chronology, then, scientific literature review, only if the order demonstrates a more important trend.

However, progression of time may still be an important factor in a thematic review. The only difference here between a "chronological" and a "thematic" approach is what is emphasized the most: the role of the Internet in presidential politics.

Note however that more authentic thematic reviews tend to break away from chronological order, scientific literature review. A review organized in this manner would shift between time periods within each section according to the point made. Methodological A methodological approach scientific literature review on the methods utilized by the researcher. For the Internet in American presidential politics project, one methodological approach would be to look at cultural differences between the portrayal of American presidents on American, British, and French websites.

Or the review might scientific literature review on the fundraising impact of the Internet on a particular political party. A methodological scope will influence either the types of documents in the review or the way in which these documents are discussed. Other Sections of Your Literature Review Once you've decided on the organizational method for your literature review, the sections you need to include in the paper should be easy to figure out because they arise from your organizational strategy.

In other words, a chronological review would have subsections for each vital time period; a thematic review would have subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue. However, sometimes you may need to add additional sections that are necessary for your study, but do scientific literature review fit in the organizational strategy of the body. What other sections you include in the body is up to you but include only what is necessary for the reader to locate your study within the larger scholarship framework.

How to Write a Literature Review: 3 Minute Step-by-step Guide - Scribbr ��

, time: 3:05

How To Write a Literature Review - Sample & Example

A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis). The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and plays). When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about  · A literature review surveys books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation of these works in relation to the research problem being blogger.com by: 3 Writing a literature review, you become an ambassador for the subject, an author owning the story. You no longer summarize the literature, but instead provide reasoning like an expert in the subject, and this is crucial. Connect with other authors I take interest in connecting with the authors of the papers I