Aristotle over 2, years ago in his Prior Analytics focused his study on arguments built from claims of the forms: All S are P. Some S is (are) P. No S is (are) P. Some S is (are) not P. The following argument, for example, uses only claims of these forms: No police officers are thieves. Some thieves are sent to prison Of course, your professor may require some variations, but here is the basic format for an Aristotelian, or classical, argumentative essay: Introduce your issue. At the end of your introduction, most professors will ask you to present your thesis. The idea is Present your case by explaining the The classical or Aristotelian model of argument is the most common type of argument. It was developed by a Greek philosopher and rhetorician, Aristotle. The goal of this model is to convince the reader about some particular point of view
Rogerian Argument // Purdue Writing Lab
This aristotelian argument outline is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission.
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use. This resource describes the fundamental qualities of argument developed by Aristotle in the vital rhetorical text On Rhetoric, aristotelian argument outline. The aristotelian argument outline of rhetoric has existed for thousands of years, predating even Socrates, Plato and the other ancient Greek philosophers that we often credit as the founders of Western philosophy.
Although ancient rhetoric is most commonly associated with the ancient Greeks and Romans, early examples of rhetoric date all the way back to ancient Akkadian writings in Mesopotamia. In ancient Greece and Rome, aristotelian argument outline, rhetoric was most often considered to be the art of persuasion and was primarily described as a spoken skill. In these societies, discourse occurred almost exclusively in the public sphere, so learning the art of effective, convincing speaking was essential for public orators, legal experts, politicians, philosophers, generals, aristotelian argument outline, and educators.
To prepare for the speeches they would need to make in these roles, students engaged in written exercises called progymnasmata. Today, rhetorical scholars still use strategies from the classical era to conceptualize argument.
However, whereas oral discourse was the main focus of the classical rhetoricians, modern scholars also study the peculiarities of written argument. Aristotle provides a crucial point of reference for ancient and modern scholars alike. Over years ago, Aristotle literally wrote the book on rhetoric, aristotelian argument outline.
His text Rhētorikḗ On Rhetoric explores the techniques and purposes of persuasion in ancient Greece, laying the foundation for the study and implementation of rhetoric in future generations.
Though the ways we communicate and conceptualize rhetoric have changed, many of the principles in this book are still used today. Below, you will find a brief guide to some of the most fundamental concepts in classical rhetoric, most of which originate in On Rhetoric. To understand how argument works in On Rhetoricyou must first understand the major aristotelian argument outline associated with rhetoric.
Aristotle identifies four major rhetorical appeals: ethos credibilitylogos logicpathos emotionaristotelian argument outline Kairos time. An easy way to conceptualize the rhetorical appeals is through advertisements, particularly infomercials or commercials. We are constantly being exposed to the types of rhetoric above, whether it be while watching television or movies, browsing the internet, or watching videos on YouTube. Imagine a commercial for a new car.
The commercial opens with images of a family driving a brand-new car through rugged, forested terrain, over large rocks, past waterfalls, and finally to a serene camping spot near a tranquil lake surrounded by giant redwood trees. The aristotelian argument outline cuts to shots of the interior of the car, showing off its technological capacities and its impressive spaciousness. A voiceover announces that not only has this car won numerous awards over its competitors but that it is also priced considerably lower than comparable models, while getting better gas mileage.
In just a few moments, this commercial has shown masterful use of all four appeals. The commercial utilizes pathos by appealing aristotelian argument outline our romantic notions of family, escape, and the great outdoors. The commercial develops ethos by listing its awards, and it appeals to our logical tendencies by pointing out we will save money immediately because the car is priced lower than its competitors, as well as in the long run because of its higher MPG rate, aristotelian argument outline.
Finally, the commercial provides an opportune and propitious moment for its targeted audience to purchase a car immediately. Depending on the nature of the text, argument, or conversation, one appeal will likely become most dominant, but rhetoric is generally aristotelian argument outline effective when the speaker or writer draws on multiple appeals to work in conjunction with one another.
To learn more about Aristotle's rhetorical appeals, click here. The classical argument is made up of five aristotelian argument outline, which are most commonly composed in the following order:. Something to include in this section is the significance of discussing the topic in this given moment Kairos. This provides the issue a sense of urgency that can validate your argument.
This is also a good opportunity to consider who your intended audience is and to address their concerns within the context of the argument. For example, if you were writing an argument on the importance of technology in the English classroom and your intended audience was the board of a local high school, you might consider the following:. Instead, consider using some of these points as evidence later on.
Ask yourself: What will be most important to my audience? What information will most likely result in the action I want to bring about? Think about which appeal will work best to gain the attention of your intended audience and start there. The narratio provides relevant foundational information and describes the social context in which your topic exists. This might include information on the historical background, including recent changes or updates to the topic, social perception, important events, and other academic research.
This helps to establish the rhetorical aristotelian argument outline for the argument: that is, the situation the argument is currently in, as impacted by events, people, opinion, and urgency of some kind. For your argument on technology in the English classroom, you might include:. Providing this type of information creates the setting for your argument. In other words, it provides the place and purpose for the argument to take place.
These two concepts function together to help set up your argument. You can think of them functioning together to form a single thesis. The propositio informs your audience of your stance, and the partitio lays out your argument.
In other words, the propositio tells your audience what you think about a topic, and the partitio briefly explains why you think that way and how you will prove your point. Because this section helps to set up the rest of your argument, you should place it near the beginning of your paper. Keep in mind, however, that you should not give away all of your information or evidence in your partitio.
This section should be fairly short: perhaps sentences at most for most academic essays. Just as a filmgoer must see an entire film to gain an understanding of its significance or quality, so too must your audience read the rest of your argument to truly understand its depth and scope. Some writing contexts call for an audience of one. Some require consideration of multiple audiences, in which case you must find ways to craft an argument which appeals to each member of your audience.
For example, if your audience included a school board as well as parents andteachers, your propositio might look something like this:. Not only would the marriage of English studies and technology extend pedagogical opportunities, it would also create an ease of instruction for teachers, engage students in creative learning environments, and familiarize students with the creation and sharing technologies that they will be expected to use at their future colleges and aristotelian argument outline. Note how the above paragraph considers the concerns and motivations of all three audience members, takes a stance, and provides support for the stance in a way that allows for the rest of the argument to grow from its ideas.
Keep in mind that whatever you promise in your propositio and partitio in this case the new teaching practices, literacy statistics, and professional opinion must appear in the body of your argument. These two represent different types of proofs that you will need to consider when crafting your argument. Aristotelian argument outline confirmatio and refutatio work in opposite ways, but are both very effective in strengthening your claims.
Confirmatio is a way to confirm your claims and is considered a positive proof; refutatio is a way to acknowledge and refute a counterclaim aristotelian argument outline is considered a negative proof. For your argument on technology in the English classroom, you might include the following:, aristotelian argument outline. The refutatio provides negative proofs.
This is an opportunity for you to acknowledge that other opinions exist and have merit, aristotelian argument outline, while also showing why those claims do not warrant rejecting your argument. If you feel strange including information that seems to undermine or weaken your own claims, ask yourself this: have you ever been in a debate with someone who entirely disregarded every point you tried to make without considering the credibility of what you aristotelian argument outline Did this make their argument less convincing?
After aristotelian argument outline an opposing viewpoint, aristotelian argument outline, you have two options. In your concession of the argument, you acknowledge the merit of the opposing argument, but you should still try to flip the evidence in a positive way.
Note how we acknowledged the opposing argument, but immediately pointed out its flaws using straightforward logic and a counterexample. In so doing, we effectively strengthen our argument and move forward with our proposal. Your peroratio is your conclusion. This is your final opportunity to make an impact in your essay and leave an impression on your audience. In this section, you are expected to summarize and re-evaluate everything you have proven throughout your argument, aristotelian argument outline.
However, there are multiple ways of doing this. Depending on the topic of your essay, you might employ one or more of the following in your closing:. Remember that your aristotelian argument outline is the last impression your audience will have of your argument.
Be sure to consider carefully which rhetorical appeals to employ to gain a desirable effect. Make sure also to summarize your findings, including the most effective and emphatic pieces of evidence from your argument, reassert your major claim, and end on a compelling, memorable note, aristotelian argument outline. Good luck and happy arguing! Find Info For Find Info For Academics Admissions Current Students Athletics About Careers Prospective Students Research and Partnerships Quick Links Apply News President Shop Visit Give Emergency.
Purdue Online Writing Lab College of Liberal Arts. Writing Lab Purdue OWL Research Contact Site Map. General Writing Academic Writing Historical Perspectives on Argumentation. Welcome to the Purdue OWL This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University, aristotelian argument outline. Classical Argument Summary: This resource describes the fundamental qualities of argument developed by Aristotle in the vital rhetorical text On Rhetoric.
How to Argue - Philosophical Reasoning: Crash Course Philosophy #2
, time: 9:43Aristotelian Argument - Excelsior College OWL
Aristotle over 2, years ago in his Prior Analytics focused his study on arguments built from claims of the forms: All S are P. Some S is (are) P. No S is (are) P. Some S is (are) not P. The following argument, for example, uses only claims of these forms: No police officers are thieves. Some thieves are sent to prison The classical or Aristotelian model of argument is the most common type of argument. It was developed by a Greek philosopher and rhetorician, Aristotle. The goal of this model is to convince the reader about some particular point of view Aristotelian Argument. Conclusion (includes one or more of following)blogger.comy of argument: reinforce views and clarify any blogger.comr, do not simply repeat established information for the sake of making the expected word blogger.com a point needs re-emphasis, use different phrases and wording. • Be prepared to re-explain the point again to show howand why it is worthy of special
No comments:
Post a Comment